Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

 

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: Optimize function - not optimal< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
 Post Number: 1
wixfigur Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: Oct. 2005
PostIcon Posted on: Sep. 18 2006,16:00  Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

First time I“ve made a multiboot DVD, with 2 Versions of XP Pro. Most files are the same - so I use the optimize func. to save disc space.
Some files are nearly the same ( txtsetup.sif ... ), the only difference is one entry.
Ive found out, that Ultra ISO cannot differ them and copys only one of them.
Ive tried the same with Microsoft "cdimage", and checked the function "duplicate search by binary comparisons" -oc.
That worked.

Maybe thats something for the next version of Ultra ISO.


Edited by wixfigur on Sep. 18 2006,16:01

--------------
http://www.ame-elektronik.de
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 2
xoben Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 2200
Joined: Nov. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Sep. 18 2006,19:16 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Thanks for your suggestion.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 3
irso Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 25
Joined: Jun. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Sep. 23 2006,01:23 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

What I read is that otimize function finds duplicates which actually are not duplicates.

If that is true, then it is not a suggestion, but a very serious bug, one that could lead to data loss.

Or am I reading it wrong?
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 4
xoben Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 2200
Joined: Nov. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Sep. 23 2006,05:44 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(irso @ Sep. 23 2006,05:23)
QUOTE
What I read is that otimize function finds duplicates which actually are not duplicates.

If that is true, then it is not a suggestion, but a very serious bug, one that could lead to data loss.

Or am I reading it wrong?

Please read carefully about:
"Some files are nearly the same ( txtsetup.sif ... ), the only difference is one entry."

PS: wixfigur wants a feature for optimizing partially identical files.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 5
irso Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 25
Joined: Jun. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Sep. 23 2006,06:31 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE


(wixfigur @ Sep. 18 2006,20:00)
QUOTE
Some files are nearly the same ( txtsetup.sif ... ), the only difference is one entry.
Ive found out, that Ultra ISO cannot differ them and copys only one of them.

Sorry, but how to understand this, then? A bit scary text, isn't it?
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 6
mwb1100 Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 14
Joined: Jun. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Sep. 23 2006,09:58 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

I thnk the way this would work is if 2 different files have a number of blocks that are the same then those blocks might be shared between the files.

I don't know how ISO data structures are laid out, but depending on this it might be possible to optimize any blocks that are identical, or if it's laid out like similar to the FAT file system, then it might be possible to optimize only if the files have the same blocks at the end (this is because FAT filesystems have the information about which block is next contained in the block itself).
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 7
multiboot Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: Oct. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 01 2006,00:04 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

I fully agree with the thread starter, UltraISO's optimizer doesn't work as precise as Microsoft's cdimage -oc. I just had to kick off some stuff from my multiboot dvd to make it fit without the optimizer, otherwise there would be errors in txtsetup.sif.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 8
irso Search for posts by this member.

Avatar



Group: Members
Posts: 25
Joined: Jun. 2006
PostIcon Posted on: Oct. 03 2006,22:49 Skip to the previous post in this topic.  Ignore posts   QUOTE


(multiboot @ Oct. 01 2006,04:04)
QUOTE
...there would be errors in txtsetup.sif.

I think, now it should be clear that there is a bug, or at least so it is reported?
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
7 replies since Sep. 18 2006,16:00 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]


 
reply to topic new topic new poll

» Quick Reply Optimize function - not optimal
iB Code Buttons
You are posting as:

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code